Comments on: Fuji GA645 – The Awesome Film Camera http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/ An American photography, writer, research engineer working in Winterthur Switzerland near Zurich Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:50:43 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Roach http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-113015 Roach Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:55:07 +0000 http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/#comment-113015 Nice one, couldnt agree more Nice one, couldnt agree more

]]> By: Mark http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-93419 Mark Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:58:22 +0000 http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/#comment-93419 Spencer, Yes, the GA645 is sweet for landscapes, I've used it for some of my favorite mountain captures. Plus the wide version is always more expensive and harder to find than the normal GA645 with the 60mm lens, plus it works better for the occasional portrait. Spencer,

Yes, the GA645 is sweet for landscapes, I’ve used it for some of my favorite mountain captures. Plus the wide version is always more expensive and harder to find than the normal GA645 with the 60mm lens, plus it works better for the occasional portrait.

]]> By: Spencer http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-93384 Spencer Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:43:34 +0000 http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/06/11/fuji-ga645-the-awesome-film-camera/#comment-93384 Seriously going to get myself a ga645 not the wide version as I feel that the 35mm would be wide enough and could apply it to other applications too. I think that the 35mm lens would be fine for landscapes though wouldn't it? Seriously going to get myself a ga645 not the wide version as I feel that the 35mm would be wide enough and could apply it to other applications too.
I think that the 35mm lens would be fine for landscapes though wouldn’t it?

]]>