<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>An American Peyote Scribble &#187; A900</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/category/cameras/sony/a900-sony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.americanpeyote.com</link> <description>American photographer, writer, thinker near Zurich Winterthur Switzerland</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator> <item><title>Sony A900 &#8211; First Impressions Sony A900</title><link>http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2009/07/08/sony-a900-first-impressions/</link> <comments>http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2009/07/08/sony-a900-first-impressions/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:54:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[A900]]></category> <category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category> <category><![CDATA[review]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.americanpeyote.com/?p=1179</guid> <description><![CDATA[My photography-digital-imaging-hobby-obsession has started peaking in the past few months. After putting up some profiles on Model Mayhem and Stylished I started getting requests for Time For CD (TFCD) shoots. So I figured: Hell, why not try out a Sony A900? Why the Sony A900? Well, I have a Minolta 7D, and all my lenses [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p
style="text-align: justify;"><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/americanpeyote/3694483397/"><img
class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1181" title="Ethan_I" src="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/wp-content/uploads/Ethan_I.jpg" alt="Ethan_I" width="350" /></a>My photography-digital-imaging-hobby-obsession has started peaking in the past few months.  After putting up some profiles on Model Mayhem and <a
href="http://de.stylished.com/Modelagentur-Winterthur/Fotografen-Winterthur/Fotograf-American-peyote-75149.html" target="_blank">Stylished</a> I started getting requests for Time For <span
class="caps">CD </span>(TFCD) shoots.  So I figured: Hell, why not try out a Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span>?  Why the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span>?  Well, I have a Minolta 7D, and all my lenses will work with the Sony <span
class="caps">DSLR</span> line.  Plus <a
href="http://www.graphicart.ch/" target="_blank">GraphicArt</a> in Zurich rents the <span
class="caps">A900</span> as well as the <span
class="caps">A700</span> and all the Zeiss and G lenses.  I started out renting the <span
class="caps">A900</span> and 24-70mm Zeiss zoom, and since picked up a body, a flash, and a Sigma 70-200 <span
class="caps">HSM</span> zoom.  What follows is a first impressions user review of the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span>, used in my apartment studio and around Winterthur and Zurich for location shooting.</p></p><p><p
style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Why the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span>?<br
/> </strong><br
/></p><p
style="text-align: justify;">Here&#8217;s my <span
class="caps">DSLR</span> history.  I started with a Canon <span
class="caps">D2000</span> from eBay, decided I like the <span
class="caps">DSLR</span> concept, moved on to a Minolta 7D (I own the Minolta 7 film camera) and basically did nothing but shoot with the 7D and expand my lighting kit.  Why?  Because for basic shooting a 6 megapixel camera is all you need.  If you have one then keep shooting with it, only camera freaks feel a constant need to upgrade.  I saw little need to buy a new <span
class="caps">DSLR</span>, in particular I saw no point unless the new camera was significantly better than my current one.  I&#8217;ve been unimpressed with the results of the Nikon <span
class="caps">D300</span> files as compared with those from my 7D, so why consider the <span
class="caps">A700 </span>(which sports a similar sensor).  But after shooting with the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span> for a weekend and seeing how much resolution and shadow texture (dynamic range) I could get with the thing, it was a natural reaction to look at my bank account and pick up a body of my own.  So to get it straight, I bought the <span
class="caps">A900</span> because I love the colors and shadow detail.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;"><strong><img
class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1175" title="Alexandra_I.jpg" src="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/wp-content/uploads/Alexandra_I-300x275.jpg" alt="Alexandra_I.jpg" width="300" height="275" />The <span
class="caps">A900</span> in the Studio</strong></p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">My first experience with the <span
class="caps">A900</span> was shooting Alexandra in my studio.  She found me through Model Mayhem and we worked out a few concepts.  Here I used the <span
class="caps">A900</span>, the 24-70mm F/2.8 <span
class="caps">ZA SSM </span>(SAL2470Z), two Elinchrom BxRi studio strobes as well as a Kacey Beauty Reflector with a Sunpak 383 flash and sometimes the Lastolite Trilite reflector kit.  The Zeiss-A900 combination really leaves little to be desired.  The resolution and color produced with this combination are simply fantastic, and almost exceeded my expectations (on can never be satisfied with camera gear).  One major problem with the Minolta 7D is focusing.  I have a number of image with a model against a wall where the camera focused on the wall instead of the model.  The resulting image would of course be slightly out of focus.  This doesn&#8217;t matter much for web stuff, but affects the image quality and provides less image information for post-processing work.  Compared to the 7D the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span> has very accurate focusing, in particular when used with a <span
class="caps">SSM </span>(Sony Super Sonic) lens.  The focus point can be controlled using a joystick on the camera, and is very useful when composing.  There&#8217;s no need to &#8220;focus and recompose&#8221; as you can just move the focus point where you want. The Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span> is the only camera to sport a function called <em>Intelligent Preview</em>. Basically with Intelligent Preview you take a preview image, you can view it on the camera <span
class="caps">LCD</span> for a few seconds, and make any adjustments necessary. On other cameras you just take an image, so at first I thought &#8220;who cares?&#8221; The face is, for light checking and shooting with the popular Strobist techniques, Intelligent Preview is a very useful feature. It allows you to fire the strobes and check exposure very quickly without filling up your memory card with test images. And when the full <span
class="caps">RAW</span> images are 35 Megabytes in size, the Intelligent Preview feature actually saves you a lot of time and storage space.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">No camera can produce an image without light. For the lighting, the Elinchrom BxRi flashes were triggered via the Skyport radio system and worked flawlessly.  I hooked the Skyport camera trigger up to the <span
class="caps">A900</span> using a hotshoe adapter from Gadget Infinity, which enables connection of a standard 1-pin flash to the Sony/Minolta flash mount.  The power of the BxRi flashes can then be adjusted directly from the camera.  This is ideal when you don&#8217;t have an assistant and have a number of lights set up. There&#8217;s nothing more annoying than standing around while the photographer fiddles around with lighting equipment.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: center;"><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/americanpeyote/3701767537/"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1176" title="Alexandra_I-2.jpg" src="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/wp-content/uploads/Alexandra_I-2.jpg" alt="Alexandra_I-2.jpg" width="400" /></a></p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">And what is the result? Perfection mon ami, perfection. The tones and colors from the <span
class="caps">A900</span> are fantastic. I shot Alexandra in a few different sets against green, red, and grey backgrounds. This included everything from a yellow dress to posing with a Katana and a severed Barbie head necklace. During the pre-shoot brainstorming stage I remember I was thinking something like, &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if she was hunting Barbie dolls in the jungle and then cut off their heads and made a necklace?&#8221;</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;"><strong><img
class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1177" title="Margarita_I.jpg" src="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/wp-content/uploads/Margarita_I-200x300.jpg" alt="Margarita_I.jpg" width="200" height="300" />The <span
class="caps">A900</span> on Location</strong></p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">I was contacted by Margarita via Stylished (she&#8217;s also on Model Mayhem).  I wanted to do some photography in an urban environment, so we headed to the old industrial area of Winterthur and moved around the old Sulzer industrial-area-turned-hip-living-area.  For this shoot I used the Sigma 70-200 <span
class="caps">HSM</span> and a Sunpak 120J with a <a
href="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2009/04/28/kacey-beauty-reflector-review/">Kacey Beauty Reflector</a>.  I always use the TR-II battery pack with the 120J, as I can shoot almost all I like without worrying about battery life.  I also had a Sunpak 383 with my Orbis ringflash adapter for added fill when needed.  Margarita and I did a few different sets in the Sulzer parking garage and then outside.  The <span
class="caps">A900</span> and Sigma combination was very nice.  The Sigma includes an in-body ultra sonic motor, giving fast and accurate focusing.  The 120J and Kacey dish is my favorite location lighting kit.  Margarita posed against concrete walls, walked around the old industrial space, and contrasted quite well with the steel framework of the place.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">Many people say you don&#8217;t need the 24 megapixels of the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span>, and this is probably true for me as well.  However, more important then sensor count is the full-frame 35mm sized sensor.  This means you&#8217;re able to use the bokeh qualities of your lenses the way they were designed to be used.  In the Sulzer garage you have sunlight filtering through the roof and wall windows, I balanced this with my strobe and opened up the aperture of the Sigma lens to get fantastic background blur &#8211; an ideal portrait setup.  I grabbed the super bokeh frames and then posed Margarita against the steel columns.  I placed the Kacey dish just out of the frame to light Margarita&#8217;s upper torso and the steel column.  Light fall-off from the Kacey dish was as fantastic as ever.  Every time I use it I&#8217;m happy I bought it.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: center;"><a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/americanpeyote/3701768289/"><img
class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1178" title="Margarita_I-2.jpg" src="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/wp-content/uploads/Margarita_I-2.jpg" alt="Margarita_I-2.jpg" width="500" /></a></p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;"><strong>The Amazing <span
class="caps">A900 </span>Files</strong></p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;ll be honest, I gag every time someone says something like, &#8220;I take real photos, I get it right <em>IN-CAMERA</em> and never use Photoshop.&#8221;  The images I see in my head can rarely be captured in-camera.  Many times they are, but like my paintings, the final image only starts with what I capture in-camera.  The ability to manipulate your images in the post-processing stage depends heavily on how much information you&#8217;ve captured in-camera.  So if you have a 24 megapixel image which isn&#8217;t focused properly, the shadows of the image will have poor definition and you&#8217;re limited in how well you&#8217;ll be able to manipulate those shadows, limiting your vision with Photoshop.  The <span
class="caps">RAW </span>.ARW image from the <span
class="caps">A900</span> are beautiful.  You can shoot in normal or cRaw, the compressed .ARW format.  The uncompressed <span
class="caps">RAW</span> files are like 35 Mb, and the cRAW are like 24 Mb.  Good money says you won&#8217;t see much difference between the two formats, and I&#8217;m shooting everything in cRAW at the moment.  Now, I bought the <span
class="caps">A900</span> to get significantly better shadows texture and dynamic range than I was achieving with the 7D.  Am I happy?  Yes &#8211; fuck yes, I am ecstatically over-joyed with the shadow texture and post-processing ability of the <span
class="caps">A900 RAW</span> files.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">But beautiful files eat up a lot of CF card space when you&#8217;re like me and only have 1 and 2 gigabyte cards. But given how cheap these things are, I plan to be shooting with 4 or 8 gig cards with the <span
class="caps">A900</span>. During shooting I copy the <span
class="caps">A900</span> files to my <a
href="http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2007/10/14/infinite-memory-card-hyperdrive-space-review/">HyperDrive Space</a>, then hook that up to my Mac Quicksilver 2002 G4 and copy the files using Adobe Lightroom.  Basic adjustments are done in Lightroom, then choice images are exported to Adobe Photoshop to achieve <em>the vision</em> then fine-tuned again in Lightroom before final export to Flickr or for printing.  I&#8217;ve been told you can just shoot <span
class="caps">JPEG</span> with the <span
class="caps">A900</span>, but I can&#8217;t figure out why.  If you&#8217;re shooting <span
class="caps">JPEG</span> with the <span
class="caps">A900</span> you probably don&#8217;t need the camera and should sell it to me at a good price so I can have a backup body.</p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;"><strong>So&#8230;</strong></p><br
/><p
style="text-align: justify;">Is the Sony <span
class="caps">A900</span> a sweet camera? Yes. Should you buy one? Yes, if you want a fine camera which produces fantastic files, has a speedy focus, handles really well. I kept my Minolta 7D for a long time, and I plan to keep on shooting with it, but I also plan on shooting with the <span
class="caps">A900</span>. The 24 megapixels are over-kill for many applications, but when you want the fine shadow textures and ability to mainuplate the light of an image, the Sony <span
class="caps">ARW</span> files are heaven to work with in Photoshop and Lightroom.</p></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.americanpeyote.com/2009/07/08/sony-a900-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/12 queries in 0.021 seconds using disk

Served from: blog.americanpeyote.com @ 2010-07-29 18:46:25 -->